Sunday, May 17, 2009

Flea Flees, continued...

The Dangers of Pesticide Application and the Pests Themselves

Following up on yesterday's post, Flee Fleas!, I wanted to be sure to give and overview of the health ramifications of the fleas and ticks themselves - in addition to the risks of using pesticides as a method of 'prevention'.

flea 2Fleas can cause a variety of illness, beyond the annoyance of their presence. Each flea bite instigates minor irritation and some pets develop an allergy to their saliva, resulting in flea allergy dermatitis, which can result in horrible itching, discomfort along with hair loss and and a variety of other skin problems including redness and scabs. In addition, fleas are often associated with tapeworm. When a dog grooms himself, he may ingest a flea carrying tapeworm larvae and the tapeworm will continue to grow in the dog’s gastrointestinal tract. Fleas also can cause flea bite anemia in tiny dogs and puppies. When many fleas feed on a small pup, significant enough blood loss can occur that may require veterinary intervention.

Ticks present a plethora of degenerative illness. Ticks make their way throughtick Fluffy’s coat, dig their heads under the skin and gorge themselves on your pet’s blood. The most common tick bourne illnesses are Lyme disease, Ehrlichiosis, Basesiosis and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Click here to find out which tick bourne illnesses are most common in your area. Be sure to be as diligent in checking yourself and family members for ticks if you find one on your pet and/ or live in a high risk area. It takes 24-48 hours for a tick to transmit disease, so your best disease prevention tactic is to be performing thorough daily checks. If you find a tick, and you are concerned, a good way to determine your dog's risk of disease is to safely remove the tick, pop it in a plastic vial and bring it to your vet for a lab analysis to see what, if any diseases it may be carrying.

Danger!Knowing the risks of these pests, I still avidly promote the use of natural flea and tick prevention and care. Consistent use of pesticide application on our pets to control flea and tick infestations are as dangerous as the pests themselves. These health risks are not limited to our pets. Poisonous to the touch, friends and family members giving their dog physical affection are unknowingly ingesting these toxins through their skin. Children are at a much higher risk, as their bodies and nervous systems are still developing and exposure to these pesticides can create risks for acute poisoning.

According to Rose Marie William’s article on BNet,

“Pesticides are neurotoxins that destroy and target pest’s nervous system, promoting an early death. Nerve gases were originally developed during WWII to use against the enemy. At the conclusion of the war, chemical companies were left with stockpiles of these toxins, and peacetime uses were sought…Little or no thought was given to health and environmental consequences and thousands of products were introduced before the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was instated.

Two-thirds of flea pesticides are neurotoxic, some are capable of reproductive damage in lab tests, and the EPA lists approximately one-half as carcinogenic,” (Williams, Safe Flea Control & Organic Labeling - Health Risks and Environmental Issues).

While ineffective against the flea cycle, pet owners spend millions on pest control, unknowingly bringing chemicals into their home that are highly toxic to their pet’s nervous system, seeping into the animals skin, poisoning them through their eyes and nose, permeating into their lungs, heart, liver, kidneys and bloodstream. Dogs who are consistently exposed to these chemicals can suffer from a variety of health repercussions. Exposure often results in immediate or long term disease responses. Common amongst those responses are allergies, respiratory problems, trembling, seizures, vomiting and diarrhea. These may seem unrelated to the pesticide application, but read the packaging carefully. The list of side effects is long. The 'hazard' warnings concerning human contact with these chemicals are dire. Yet we go ahead and apply this stuff directly to the skin of our pets - because it comes from a licensed health practitioner. Therefore, it must be safe...Think again! The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published their concerns a month ago, in an article titled Increased Scrutiny of Flea and Tick Control Products for Pets.

Chronic illness rates are on the rise amongst our pets, as each generation of dogs is systemically exposed to stronger and more potent chemicals (in addition to effects of over-vaccination and commercially prepared, chemical laden diets). Many allergy sufferers derive long term benefits from stopping chemical exposure and allowing the system to heal.

In response to consistent exposure to flea and tick preventative, the flea has a longer life cycle then ever before and is able to thrive in conditions once known to kill them. Responding to the more persistent nature of the pest’s, the multi-million dollar industry of pet pesticides has had to use ever stronger chemicals to eradicate them.

In my first post on the subject, Flee Fleas!, I discuss how I go about controlling fleas and ticks without the use of pesticides. While researching the topic, I found a plethora of information available with plenty more suggestions on how to do so.

It is becoming increasingly obvious to consumers that pesticide application is compromising the health of our pets, yet veterinarians, those who are supposed to be looking out for Fido and Fluffy’s best interest, continue to push prescription pesticide products, luring pet parents into a false sense of security regarding their pet's health. In taking on the responsibility of pet guardianship, we also assume responsibility to think outside of medical conventions, which are all too often based on precedent, not on the efficacious ability to prevent disease. NDRC

The National Resources Defense Council has published a highly informative article on the risks of flea and tick preventatives, for more information on the topic.

It is time for responsible pet owners to look beyond the industries and individuals who push these products and decide for themselves if they will pay for expensive pesticide products - in addition to the emotional and financial cost of veterinary care that their pets will need from exposure to chemicals. Diligent prevention and care of your pet will be more effective then any chemical pesticide.

3 comments:

  1. Hey dude. That was one sweet lip-curling face you had there. A+.

    We used to need Frontline year-round in Texas, especially since we ran through tree and grass-filled areas with a river every single morning. Mom hated using it! And it would upset Big Pupi's tummy each time. That can't be good...

    But now in a city we use an essential oil mix sprayed on as a deterrent. There just isn't as great a bug risk when you're surrounded by cement!

    Boo, chemicals!!
    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Stan! Thanks for stopping by my site. I am one lip curling beast!

    Glad your mom no longer uses that icky chemical stuff and Big P's tummy is feeling better. I live in a city, but its heavily wooded. Between essential oils, raw meaty bone feasts and some Brewer's Yeast, we are ALL good!

    Bark at 'ya later!
    Louis
    ReplyDelete
  3. I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.


    Betty

    http://smallpet.info
    ReplyDelete